Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Disagreement on time causing change
Though time simplifies the explanation of what causes change a lot I don't think it really covers everything. An example KDF is using is growing over time but I don't really like that. People grow over time not because of the time but because there body is gaining more nutrients and allowing its cells to multiply. But if you took away the nutrients and all you have left is the time the body will not grow. So time does not really explain anything it is just what happens in that time that causes the change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I agree. Time does change things BUT BUT BUT only in a miniscule way. I also LOVED Kendalls post
I agree. Troy apparently strongly agrees with time being a factor of change. but i agree with you. how can time cause change? it doesn't.
I agree that time doesn't cause change. Other things cause change over time. After all time doesn't really exist, its just a state of mind.
Change can't happen without time though. It also can only been measured over time so you defenetly need time to let change happen, but I agree that time isn't the cause of change.
I disagree with you. I think that time does cause change because even if you stopped giving nutrients to your body it would change. Your body would lose its muscle and mass which would not be a good thing but it would still be change.
time doesn't cause change but change couldn't happen without time
This is for Katie's comment. I agree that in the time nutrients weren't given to the body the body would change but it's pretty obvious that time isn't what is mainly causing the body to change because if that were so the body shouldn't be changing any differently because you didn't change the variable of time. It was the variable of giving or not giving the nutrients that caused the body to change.
Post a Comment