Wednesday, January 9, 2008
Change and the Electromagnetic Force.
Electromagnetic force is the attraction between opposites like how a negatively charged thing is attracted by positively charged things. A real life example of this is how people often depict computer geeks being extremely involved in fantasy games. I mean computer geeks need to be very logical because they are dealing with such complex programs and technology. But for some reason they like to play games about magic which is basically impossible. So I think that's a good example of opposites attracting. Another example is how people will often rage war to gain peace. Like the War on Terror that is happening right now. We are fighting and killing in order to ensure no more people will die??? I think that is pretty opposite. In my world the idea of electromagnetic force has caused change because of the War on Terror example I previously said. In my world electromagnetic magnetic force has caused change because it creates the different molecule and compounds that make everything up around me.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
I really like your example of the war on terror and as tor said there are two opposites in the statement "fighting for peace". You make a good point with the geeks and fantasy games. You would a think a geek would want to play some complex game with a lot of technology in it.
I understand what you mean by "fighting for peace". The book 1984 say what you said to some extent being that "War is Peace". It a really well written book check it out some time. And I thought your geeks with fantasy games is good but kind of funny.
Your example of the war on terror is really really good. It's a perfect example of opposites attracting. I think computer geeks play fantasy games because those games are usually really involved and you have to really get the idea behind the game to play some of them. The plot's are usually really complex and hard to figure out. Since those people are usually really smart they need more sensory imput so those games fufill that need.
I really like your war example but do not completely agree with your geek gaming example. You can't say that geeks like to play fantasy games because not all geeks do.
I'm not sure if i agree with your peace and violence example. I see what you're saying with the wars for peace and whatnot, but in general, i dont know if it always works. A person who is happy and truly at peace will not go on a violent rampage, and likewise, an angry person prone to violence isn't likely to start teaching sunday school. Not that those sorts of things never happen, they do i'm sure, but just saying..
Let's explore this war and peace this. It is obviously a pertinent issue in today's society. Are you all saying that war and peace are attracted to each other? Or are you saying that they are sort of "stuck" together because they are fundamentally entrenched in our thought process and justification for going to war? Is peace always the reason for going to war? Why are we at war? Should we be at war? Is killing people justified if it brings about peace in the future? Can peace ever be achieved? A lot of questions, not science related necessarily but good nonetheless, chances are, you will experience wars in your future and need to make these decisions.
Is peace always the reason for going to war? Why are we at war? Should we be at war? Is killing people justified if it brings about peace in the future? Can peace ever be achieved? Well, Bvoight, I think there are a couple of answers to those questions. First of all, peace, in my opinion, is not the cause of war, disagreement is. Like 911, the terrorists didn't agree with the way we lived, so they tried to sort us out. We didn't like the fact that Saddam supposedly had womd (weapons of mass destruction), and the way he went about leadership, so we sorted him out. The revolutionary war was caused by the colonists because they disagreed with England's morals and ways of ruling. I think that we could not live without war, because we are always disagreeing. We settle arguments and disputes through war. It isn't necessarily the best way to go about it though. I'm not sure about the justification of killing people for the peace to come, but I don't think peace will ever be achieved or it won't be for a long time. I don't necessarily have the best thoughts on it, but it's the best I can think of now.
I like your examples they really make sense but dont you think its a bit of a stretch when saying its related to EF?
but in the view of politics that makes a lot of sense.
Post a Comment